In the spirit of Matt's New Years Resolution 5: Aid Watch has just posted a blog implying that US aid to Egypt is supporting their Government rather than helping the Egyptian people. The evidence? This:
Yet the evidence presented here does nothing to tell us whether or not the Government is being supported, whether the Egyptian people are benefiting from the aid, or both. All it tells us is that aid is largely channeled through the state. It is definitely possible that such aid is supporting the regime, but here are a few alternative suggestions as to why this might be the case:
- The state is more efficient than the NGO community in Egypt. This may or may not be true, but we can't tell from here.
- They are supporting activities that require state sanction, like the building of free primary schools, or provision of free healthcare through the national systems of education or health.
- They are supporting greater transparency of state activities by publishing more state information (again, I've no idea if this is true, but it would be compatible with the above).
- They are supporting better, more rule-based, and more transparent public financial management (USAID do this in a few countries so it wouldn't be a surprise).

2 Comments
Nice post. Also worth a mention is that Easterly manages to link to, read, and extract a factoid from, a paper while failing to notice or mention that the bulk of the evidence it presents is at odds with his more general hypothesis that aid agency's are all about supporting bad governments.
I've never liked aid watch. Anyway--what kind of aid--ODA or non ODA?